
Nice legs! Finger lickin' good!
I like Katie Couric for the same reason I don't take her seriously. It's not because she is a woman. I have met some very strong and inspiring women, and believe it or not, one of my favorite managers was a woman.
She also used to be a spook, which made her wicked cool. It is not because she is bubbly. I know girls who can outbubble champagne, but are intensely serious when it came to their jobs, which they did well, and their family. Mainly it is because Katie trades on her looks and plays the feminist angle at the same time.
I remember back in 2003 when Katie was asked to trade places with Jay Leno. Jay would host
Today, and
Katie would host The Tonight Show. After a forgettable monologue, Katie sat at Jay's desk, and some construction worker guy came by with a power saw and cut off the front skirt of the desk so that you could see Katie's magnificent legs. My first instinct was to drop the remote - no Letterman tonight.
Contrast that with Katie's latest emotional blog about being the only woman/girl at the White House during a private Presidential press briefing. She then goes on to talk about how Rwanda and Sweden have nearly 50% female representation in their parliaments, while the US lags behind.
Little girl, cry me a river.
Honestly, I have nothing against more women in politics and business. Some of the worst bosses I have ever had were men - they were either spineless and inexperienced, or arrogant and incompetent. Don't even start with GWB. If a woman can improve upon that, I say let her - and most of the industrialized world agrees. But this business that women should dominate half of the top positions in society everywhere makes no damned sense.
Here's the news - women don't dominate the world because they don't have to. Every woman that is good looking enough to attract a successful man (and shrewd enough to keep him) doesn't have to work. Society proclaims that a real man can take care of his family financially - so a woman working for the next promotion is often
optional. That's a fact even before kids are in the equation.
Let's add kids then. When a female professional gets knocked up, her company is obliged in the US to give her paid time to prepare for the birth, and care for the infant at least for a while. At the same time, the firm must hold her job or something at the same level until she comes back to resume her duties. While this doesn't hurt her current earning potential, she might miss out on opportunities to shine and make her case for promotion to senior management. Add to that the fact that many women, wholely on their own, decide to resign their jobs until the child is able to go to school or is at least old enough to be left alone after school. That age ranges from 10 or so and up. Ten years out of any industry, and it will be a tough road to make the boardroom. This scenario applies to a lot of women - women who may not be ruling a F500 firm, but are having a very fulfilling life nonetheless.
Contrast that with men. Men work. Men have always worked. If men don't work, they aren't considered men - especially in America (elsewhere, they are only expected to provide - nobility for example). Unless they marry money, or have a wife with a ton more earning potential, working is a certainty - never an option. If men want a bigger house, they need to work harder, get a promotion, rob a bank. There is no nagging the wife until she makes it happen, in most cases. Therefore, there is no break for men (generally) that would take them out of the running for top positions - so even if every company in the world was headed by a male feminazi, every board room would still be filled with men. For heaven's sake -
MADD's boardroom is filled with men!
The long and the short of it is that women aren't in the highest perches of politics and government because a) they don't
have to be and b) they have other priorities. Sure, sexism still comes into play, but even if it didn't the numbers would be much the same.
As for the Swedish - there won't be one at the rate they are going, birth rate vs. death rate that is. So much for them as a feminist success story.
Labels: Entertainment, Politics